Risk Integration Technical Element Module
Overview
The Risk Integration (RI) technical element aggregates PRA outputs into plant‑level risk metrics and insights. It consumes sequence/family frequencies and importance from Event Sequence Quantification (ESQ) and consequence metrics from Radiological Consequence Analysis (RC), applies risk significance criteria, performs screening/aggregation, and produces integrated risk metrics with uncertainty and feedback. It aligns with RG 1.247 expectations (HLR‑RI‑A…D) for establishing criteria, calculating overall risk, identifying significant contributors, and documenting/feedback.
Purpose
- Define and apply risk significance criteria to PRA elements (sequences, families, basics, systems, HFEs)
- Compute integrated risk metrics (e.g., CDF, LERF, application‑specific metrics) with uncertainty
- Identify significant contributors and screening dispositions with clear basis
- Provide feedback to upstream elements (ESQ, RC, systems/HRA via proxies) for model improvements
- Document methods, assumptions, thresholds, and acceptance criteria mapping
Structure
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Risk Integration │
│ │
│ ┌──────────────────────────────┐ ┌──────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ Criteria & Screening │ │ Inputs (via Proxies) │ │
│ │ - RiskSignificanceCriteria │ │ - ESQ: RiskSignificantEventSequence │ │
│ │ - RiskSignificanceEvaluation │ │ - RC : RiskSignificantConsequence │ │
│ │ - ScreeningStatus/Criteria │ │ - Mappings (Seq→Release Category) │ │
│ └──────────────────────────────┘ └──────────────────────────────────────┘ │
│ │
│ ┌──────────────────────────────┐ ┌──────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ Integration & Metrics │ │ Contributors & Insights │ │
│ │ - IntegratedRiskResults │ │ - RiskContributor (importance, RAW) │ │
│ │ - RiskMetric (value, unc.) │ │ - SignificantContributor analyses │ │
│ └──────────────────────────────┘ └──────────────────────────────────────┘ │
│ │
│ ┌──────────────────────────────┐ ┌──────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ Documentation & Feedback │ │ Dependency Hygiene │ │
│ │ - Process/peer review hooks │ │ - Use ESQ/RC re‑exports; refs only │ │
│ │ - Feedback to ESQ/RC │ │ - String refs for upstream entities │ │
│ └──────────────────────────────┘ └──────────────────────────────────────┘ │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘Key Features
- Risk significance criteria with absolute/relative thresholds and intended applications
- Evaluation records per element with basis and insights
- Integrated risk metrics with units and uncertainty; optional acceptance criteria mapping
- Clean inputs via ESQ and RC proxy types (no direct upstream dependencies)
- Significant contributor identification with FV/RAW/RRW/Birnbaum and screening status
- Feedback channels to ESQ/RC capturing insights and recommended changes
Core Components
RiskSignificanceCriteria,RiskSignificanceEvaluationIntegratedRiskResults,RiskMetricRiskContributorand significant contributor references- Proxied input types:
RiskSignificantEventSequence(ESQ) andRiskSignificantConsequence(RC) - Mapping references:
EventSequenceReference,EventSequenceFamilyReference,ReleaseCategoryReference,SourceTermDefinitionReference
Integration with Other Technical Elements
| Element | Interaction |
|---|---|
| Event Sequence Quantification | Provides sequence/family frequencies, importance, and risk‑significant lists via proxy types |
| Radiological Consequence | Provides consequence metrics and risk‑significant consequences via proxy types |
| Mechanistic Source Term | Referenced indirectly via RC (release categories, source term IDs) |
| Systems/HRA/Data | Reflected indirectly through ESQ inputs (cut sets, HFEs, parameters) |
Best Practices
- Use ESQ/RC re‑exports only; avoid direct upstream imports to preserve hierarchy
- Keep criteria explicit (metric, thresholds, justification, intended applications)
- Report both absolute and relative bases where applicable; state minimum reporting level
- Maintain clear screening status with rationale and traceability
- Surface actionable feedback to ESQ/RC when screening or metrics indicate modeling opportunities
Regulatory Alignment (RG 1.247)
| Expectation / Requirement | Schema Support |
|---|---|
| HLR‑RI‑A (Criteria definition/application) | RiskSignificanceCriteria, RiskSignificanceEvaluation |
| HLR‑RI‑B (Overall risk calculation) | IntegratedRiskResults, RiskMetric with units/uncertainty |
| HLR‑RI‑C (Identification of contributors) | RiskContributor, importance metrics, screening status |
| HLR‑RI‑D (Documentation/feedback) | Documentation hooks in main interface and feedback channels to ESQ/RC |
Usage Workflow
- Define
RiskSignificanceCriteriafor target metrics (CDF, LERF, application‑specific) - Ingest ESQ and RC proxy inputs (risk‑significant sequences/consequences, mappings)
- Aggregate to integrated metrics; compute uncertainty and compare to acceptance criteria
- Apply criteria and produce
RiskSignificanceEvaluationrecords; set screening statuses - Identify
RiskContributors and capture importance and insights - Provide feedback objects back to ESQ/RC; document process, assumptions, and peer review
Example
See inline examples in risk-integration.ts for criteria, evaluations, and integrated metrics. Use ESQ/RCA proxy types for inputs (e.g., RiskSignificantEventSequence).
Additional Resources
- Source: risk-integration.ts
- Regulatory documentation: Risk Integration Documentation
- Integration patterns: integration-readme.md
Glossary (Selected)
- Risk Metric: Quantified plant risk measure (e.g., CDF) with units/uncertainty
- Risk Significance: Determination of contributors exceeding criteria thresholds
- Screening: Dispositioning contributors (retain/group/truncate) with basis
This README summarizes the Risk Integration technical element and its RG 1.247 alignment, providing consistent interfaces and integration points within the OpenPRA MEF.
