Treatment of radionuclide barriers.
Optional
commonCommon assumptions that apply across this technical element Using the standardized BaseAssumption interface
The date the technical element was created
Treatment of dependencies in quantification.
dependencyTreatment: {
dependenciesByType: {
"FUNCTIONAL": {
treatmentDescription: "Modeled through explicit system fault tree linking",
modelingMethod: "Shared basic events and logical connections",
examples: ["Support system X failure impacts frontline systems Y and Z"]
},
// ... other dependency types
},
// ... other dependency aspects
}
Optional
descriptionThe description of the technical element
Documentation of the Event Sequence Quantification process.
documentation: {
processDescription: "Event trees and fault trees were integrated and quantified using a Monte Carlo simulation approach.",
inputs: ["Component reliability databases", "Plant-specific operating experience"],
appliedMethods: ["Fault Tree Linking", "Monte Carlo Uncertainty Propagation"],
resultsSummary: "Overall CDF is estimated at 2.5e-5 per year, with...",
// ... other documentation aspects
}
Event sequence families defined for quantification.
Importance analysis of contributors.
Documentation of quantification limitations.
limitationsDocumentation: {
quantificationLimitations: [
{
limitationId: "LIM-001",
description: "Limited plant-specific data for certain components",
applicationImpact: "May affect uncertainty in specific sequences",
potentialWorkarounds: "Use of sensitivity studies to bound impact"
}
],
// ... other limitations documentation aspects
}
Handling of circular logic and mutually exclusive events.
Circular logic situations and their resolutions
Optional
flagEvents?: Record<string, FlagEvent>Flag events used in quantification
Mutually exclusive events and their treatment
Treatment of system successes
logicalChallenges: {
circularLogic: {
"CIRC-001": {
description: "Circular dependency between system A and system B",
involvedElementIds: ["SYS-A", "SYS-B"],
resolutionMethod: CircularLogicResolutionMethod.CONDITIONAL_SPLIT_FRACTIONS,
resolutionDescription: "Used conditional split fractions to break the loop"
}
},
mutuallyExclusiveEvents: {
"MEX-001": {
description: "Pump A and Pump B cannot both fail due to same cause",
eventIds: ["BE-PUMP-A-CCF", "BE-PUMP-B-CCF"],
basis: "Different design and location",
treatmentMethod: "Explicit logic in fault trees"
}
}
}
Optional
mechanisticReferences to the Mechanistic Source Term Analysis.
Additional metadata specific to Event Sequence Quantification.
metadata: {
version: "1.0",
analysisDate: "2024-07-26",
analyst: "Jane Doe",
reviewer: "John Smith",
approvalStatus: "Approved",
scope: ["Internal Events"],
limitations: ["Conservative assumptions used for some parameters"],
assumptions: [{ id: "A-001", description: "No external events considered in this quantification." }]
}
Integration of models from various technical elements.
modelIntegration: {
integrationMethod: "Linked Event Trees with Fault Trees",
softwareTools: ["RISKMAN", "CAFTA"],
integrationSteps: ["Link initiating events to event trees", "Map system failures to fault trees", "..."],
integrationVerification: "Verified through manual checks of selected sequences"
}
The date the technical element was last modified
Optional
ownerThe owner of the technical element
Optional
peerPeer review documentation.
peerReviewDocumentation: {
reviewDate: "2024-08-15",
reviewTeam: ["John Smith", "Jane Doe"],
reviewScope: "Complete ESQ technical element",
findings: [
{
findingId: "F-001",
description: "Some dependency relationships not fully documented",
significance: "MEDIUM",
status: "CLOSED",
resolution: "Documentation updated to include all dependencies",
associatedRequirement: "ESQ-C1"
}
],
conclusions: "ESQ element meets requirements with minor improvements recommended"
}
Optional
preDocumentation of pre-operational assumptions and limitations.
preOperationalDocumentation: {
preOperationalAssumptions: [
{
assumptionId: "PA-001",
description: "Component reliability based on design specifications",
impact: "May not reflect as-built performance",
validationApproach: "Update with plant-specific data when available",
validationTiming: "After first year of operation"
}
],
// ... other pre-operational documentation aspects
}
Details of the quantification methods used.
Quantification approach used
Computer codes used
Optional
postInitiatorHFEHandling?: stringHandling of post-initiator human failure events
Optional
recoveryActionTreatment?: RecoveryActionTreatmentTreatment of recovery actions
Truncation details
quantificationMethods: {
approach: QuantificationApproach.FAULT_TREE_LINKING,
computerCodes: [{ name: "RISKMAN", version: "3.2", verificationDocumentation: "VALID-001", validationDocumentation: "VALID-001" }],
truncation: {
method: TruncationMethod.ABSOLUTE_FREQUENCY,
finalValue: 1.0e-9,
convergenceDemonstration: "Sequence frequencies changed by less than 1% when truncation was lowered from 1.0e-9 to 1.0e-10"
}
}
Quantification results for each event sequence and family.
quantificationResults: {
"LOCA-Small-LossOfOffsitePower": {
meanFrequency: { value: 1.0e-5, unit: "/year" },
uncertaintyDistribution: { type: "LOGNORMAL", parameters: { median: 1.0e-5, errorFactor: 3.0 } },
riskSignificantContributors: ["Diesel Generator Failure", "Operator Failure to Recover Offsite Power"]
}
}
Optional
quantificationReview process for quantification results.
Future enhancement: Consider adding more detailed review documentation including peer review findings and resolution tracking
quantificationReview: {
reviewCriteria: ["Logical consistency", "Comparison to similar plants", "Reasonableness of results"],
reviewFindings: [
{
id: "FIND-001",
description: "Sequence XYZ frequency appears unusually high",
correctiveActions: "Reviewed and corrected fault tree logic for system A"
}
],
plantComparison: {
comparisonPlants: ["Plant X", "Plant Y"],
keyDifferences: ["Different ECCS design", "Different support system dependencies"],
differenceExplanation: "Higher LOCA frequencies due to different pipe material specifications"
}
}
Optional
referencesReferences to other technical elements
Optional
riskRisk integration information. This field provides information specifically structured for consumption by risk integration.
Optional
riskIntegrationFeedback?: {Feedback received from risk integration. This field contains feedback from risk integration that should be considered in future revisions of the event sequence quantification.
ID of the risk integration analysis that provided the feedback
Optional
feedbackDate?: stringDate the feedback was received
Optional
generalFeedback?: stringGeneral feedback on the event sequence quantification
Optional
response?: {Response to the feedback
Optional
changes?: string[]Changes made or planned in response to the feedback
Description of how the feedback was or will be addressed
Status of the response
Optional
sequenceFeedback?: {Feedback on specific event sequences
Risk-significant event sequences identified in this analysis. This provides a simplified view of risk-significant sequences for risk integration.
Optional
statusThe status of the technical element
Optional
tagsTags associated with the technical element
The type of technical element
Uncertainty and sensitivity analyses.
uncertaintyAnalysis: {
propagationMethod: "MONTE_CARLO",
numberOfSamples: 10000,
randomSeed: 12345,
parameterUncertainties: [
{
parameterId: "PARAM-001",
distributionType: DistributionType.LOGNORMAL,
distributionParameters: { mean: 1.0e-3, errorFactor: 3 },
basis: "Industry data with Bayesian update"
}
],
// ... other uncertainty aspects
}
Documentation of model uncertainties.
uncertaintyDocumentation: {
modelUncertaintySources: [
{
sourceId: "MU-001",
description: "Uncertainty in success criteria for system X",
impact: "Moderate impact on sequence frequencies",
relatedAssumptions: ["Success assumed based on design calculations"],
alternativeApproaches: ["More conservative success criteria"],
treatmentApproach: "Sensitivity analysis performed"
}
],
// ... other uncertainty documentation aspects
}
The version of the technical element